-1

archive,category,category-uncategorized,category-1,wp-theme-stockholm,theme-stockholm,stockholm-core-2.2.1,woocommerce-no-js,eio-default,select-theme-ver-8.0,ajax_fade,page_not_loaded,,qode_menu_,qode-mobile-logo-set,qode-single-product-thumbs-below,wpb-js-composer js-comp-ver-6.6.0,vc_responsive,elementor-default,elementor-kit-31

Uncategorized

July 31, 2025 In Art, Photography, Uncategorized By Brian

ANSEL ADAMS: ART INSPIRING ACTION

Ansel Adams, the legendary photographer and environmentalist, continues to leave an enormous legacy in the contemporary world. His iconic black-and-white photographs of the American wilderness, particularly the landscapes of Yosemite National Park and the Sierra Nevada, have shaped how we perceive the natural world and our responsibility to protect it. Adams’ influence extends far beyond photography; his work resonates in art, conservation, education and advocacy for environmental protection.

Environmental Advocacy Through Art

Adams was not only a photographer but also an environmentalist. His images played a pivotal role in raising awareness about the beauty and fragility of America’s wild places. By capturing the grandeur of untouched landscapes, Adams instilled a sense of awe and an urgency to protect these spaces.

In today’s context of climate change and habitat destruction, his work is a reminder of what is at stake. His images inspire new generations of environmental activists and artists to use visual media as a tool for advocacy. Photographers, filmmakers and, now, content creators cite Adams as a role model in their efforts to document and preserve nature, using the power of art to communicate the pressing need for conservation, sustainability and community resilience.

Art as a Universal Language

Adams believed that photography could transcend language and cultural barriers, speaking directly to the human connection with nature. His images of Half Dome, the Tetons, and countless other landscapes are not just representations of places but invitations to connect with the natural world. For me, this is at the heart of an image of any landscape.

Education and Accessibility

Adams was dedicated to sharing his knowledge, ensuring that photography as an art form remained accessible to all. Through his books, workshops, and lectures, he taught countless individuals how to see the world through a lens with technical proficiency, artistic sensitivity and that passion for landscapes and their protection. Today, his teachings live on in photography schools, online courses, and workshops that emphasise the principles of visual storytelling and environmental consciousness. Adams’ philosophy – that the act of creating art is deeply tied to one’s connection to the world – continues to resonate.

Conservation Photography

Adams’ work laid the foundation for the field of conservation photography, which uses compelling visuals to advocate for the protection of ecosystems and biodiversity. Photographers cite Adams as a key influence in their work. His philosophy – that art can inspire action – remains a guiding principle for photographers who use their creativity to address pressing environmental challenges.

Continuing the Dialogue

Adams’ legacy is more than a collection of extraordinary images – it’s a call to action. His work reminds us of the intrinsic value of nature and the importance of preserving it for future generations. In a world increasingly defined by urbanisation and environmental degradation, Adams’ photographs stand as testaments to the beauty and importance, indeed the necessity, of wild spaces.

Through art, education, and advocacy, Adams continues to inspire people to see, appreciate and protect the world around them. His impact is felt across disciplines and generations.

‘Thick and Rich’ is more than Pasta Sauce

In this post I’d like to highlight why ‘thick and rich’ understanding of communities is essential to support community resilience.

Doing deep qualitative work for community resilience is essential because it allows for a comprehensive, nuanced understanding of the lived experiences, needs, and aspirations of the community. Unlike quantitative methods that focus on numbers and generalised data, qualitative research delves into the human aspects of resilience, offering insights that are rich, complex, and deeply rooted in the local context.

Communities are not monolithic. They are diverse in terms of culture, history, values, and challenges. A deep qualitative approach—through interviews, observation, conversations and storytelling—gives space for individuals within the community to express their experiences, values, and perspectives. This allows for a more holistic understanding of their resilience. It acknowledges that resilience is not just about bouncing back from disasters, but about how communities adapt, transform, and thrive in the face of challenges, often drawing from their experiences, social networks, and local knowledge.

One of the key reasons to engage in qualitative work is that it uncovers the underlying factors that contribute to or hinder resilience. For example, a community might face recurring floods, but through qualitative research, you may discover that beyond the immediate threat of water, there are deep-seated issues related to governance, power dynamics, or social inequalities. These deeper issues are often missed in more superficial, quantitative studies. By focusing on individual and collective narratives, qualitative work sheds light on the social, emotional, and cultural dimensions of resilience, offering a fuller picture of how communities adapt and survive.

Moreover, deep qualitative work builds relationships of trust and collaboration between researchers and the community. By engaging with community members in open, empathetic conversations, you create opportunities for mutual learning and shared understanding. This process is not one-sided; it is about giving voice to people who may not typically have the platform to speak about their experiences. This approach empowers communities, making them active participants in the resilience-building process rather than subjects of study. When communities feel heard and understood, they are more likely to invest in and take ownership of the strategies and solutions that emerge.

Another crucial benefit of qualitative work is its ability to uncover local knowledge and innovative practices that can be essential to resilience. Many communities, especially in rural or marginalised areas, have developed their own adaptive strategies over generations. These local practices—whether they involve sustainable farming techniques, resource sharing, or dispute resolution—are often overlooked in mainstream understanding but are vital to resilience. Deep qualitative work helps to document and preserve this knowledge, while also allowing us to identify opportunities for scaling or integrating these strategies and/or their principles, into larger resilience frameworks.

Additionally, qualitative research is flexible, allowing for an adaptive and responsive approach. As you engage with a communities, new insights may emerge that shift the direction of your inquiry or highlight areas previously unseen. This responsiveness is critical for working in dynamic and complex environments, where resilience is constantly being tested by shifting social, economic, and environmental pressures.

In sum, deep qualitative work is integral to understanding and supporting community resilience because it allows you to connect with the community on a human level, recognise and document local knowledge, uncover deeper structural issues, and build trust and collaboration. This method emphasises the value of listening to people, empowering them to contribute to their own resilience and ensuring that any interventions are rooted in the community’s unique context. By fostering this deeper connection, qualitative work plays a crucial role in creating more sustainable and adaptive communities.

April 19, 2025 In Conversations with communities, Uncategorized By Brian

Conversations with Communities

There’s a phrase that I’m hearing with increasing regularity: inclusive community engagement. To be sure, the phrase doesn’t always use these exact words, but the phrase acts like an umbrella in practices related to community-led actions for sustainable landscapes. I hear practitioners talk about it and I hear travellers talk about it.

Like lot’s of ideas and broad umbrella concepts, it’s always good to take a step back to reflect on what the phrase means and how it can be used in different ways with different meanings. A beginning point is with the ‘revolution of ideas’ that has been occurring over the last 40 years or so.

There have been multiple drivers of this revolution. Perhaps one of the most significant has been a shift in understanding knowledge. Without going into detail, we have entered what social scientists call ‘post-modernity’. There are multiple characteristics, but for us the important characteristic relates to knowledge and experiences. We now recognise that there are multiple forms of knowledge and experience, not just that of science or technical management or the expert.

In turn, we’ve seen a shift in thinking about communities, community development and community resilience:

A shift in the role of expert knowledge. Technical knowledge is important, but it is seen as one way of looking at things.

A recognition that there are multiple ways of experiencing things. This means people experience things differently based on all kinds of characteristics – gender, age, ethnicity, education, health, income etc.

A movement to somehow, in some ways, trying to harness these 2 things in the quest for resolving issues, implementing change, developing and rolling out programmes and, ultimately, for community resilience.

Those three words ‘inclusive community engagement’ have been impacted by this revolution of ideas/thinking.

Inclusive has moved from:

Not being part of the language, to

An expert making decisions on behalf of people/groups, to

Experts recognising that some groups need to be consulted, to

Professionals recognising and understanding the nature of the diversity of people’s experiences, fears, dreams, aspirations and knowledge and ensuring that programmes, projects, interventions etc are representative of this so they are inclusive.

Community has moved from:

A geographic place name inhabited by people, to

A complex site of social, economic and political processes impacting on people and groups differently. It has its own dynamic, but there are socio-economic and political processes beyond the reach of the community that will and do impact.

Engagement has moved from:

Experts making decisions for people/groups, to

Experts consulting with people/groups, to

Different groups being brought together around the table, to

People collaborating and co-creating – mutually identifying issues, concerns and possible solutions.

Of course, social change is a messy thing, but one thing is certain – these changes have provided a space for having conversations with communities. I don’t mean this in a ‘let’s talk about things’ way that ignores the ways some voices get heard and others don’t or are marginalised. I mean it in a ‘Let’s get creative and look for transformative social change for sustainable communities and landscapes’ kind of way, where we all recognise our optimal ignorance and share experiences, insights and ideas to frame actions.

It’s this latter meaning that informs my ideas, practice and experience.